Monday, May 9, 2005

Lots of Movement in SCO v. IBM -- 8:43 am CST, Update by The Master

There's been a lot of movement in the SCO v. IBM lawsuit in the last week, and instead of trying to regurgitate everything in detail, I recommend a review of the last week's posts on Groklaw. The gist of it is that due to G2's Motion to Intervene and Motion to Unseal begin denied, IBM has begun to post redacted versions of some sealed documents, including this one, which shows just how slimy SCO's lawfirm of Boies Schiller can be. In addition, IBM supplied everything SCO asked for including the code as far back as IBM has it. I wonder if SCO is going to regret having gotten G2 involved in this case.

A.T. Hun comments: In a related story, it seems like Maureen O'Gara is up to her old tricks again. That's a link to the Linux Today editorial on her article. If you really want to read her crap, you can find it from there. O'Gara is at least showing her true colors. She is a hack and a shill who has now gotten into the character assassination business. I don't know Groklaw's PJ from Adam, but it doesn't really matter. If her arguments are invalid, then counter them with facts and logic, not narrow-minded stupidity posing as journalism. O'Gara apparently has plenty of the latter but precious little of the former. Oh, here's an exclusive for her next column: my name's not really A.T. Hun either.

The Master comments: Update: PJ has responded to O'Gara's intimidation tactics on Groklaw.

News for 05/09/2005

The Haus is powered by:

All original information on this website is copyright © TheHaus.Net, 1999-2005. The use of original images, text, and/or code from this website without expressed written consent is prohibited. The authors of this site cannot be held responsible for any damage, real or imagined, which comes from the use of information presented on this site. All trademarks used are the properties of their respective owners. This site is not to be used as a floatation device (but if you try, I want a video tape of it).